[adamnbrown]

I got 167.8 BHP and torque 257.4 ftlbs.

 

[Lashed]

Is that a good result for an 8v engine? :shrug:

 

[HERC]

Nice result buddy, now where is the graph asyou know people are going to want to see it

 

[adamnbrown]

Yer i will get it up when i get my hands on a scanner! lol. Yer Lashed it is a good result from an 8V. Its a 50BHP increase.

 

[Will DCE]

is that at the wheels mate ?

 

[Raymo]

is that at the wheels mate ?

I wouldnt think so, generally the figures are Flywheel based albeit they do give the "at the wheel" figures aswell, still good results though:thumbs:

 

[adamnbrown]

Not sure to be honest. It was done by Dyno Rolling roads. Dont think it tells me on the graph. All it says is it was in 4th gear.!?!?!?! haha

 

[Lashed]

Yer i will get it up when i get my hands on a scanner! lol. Yer Lashed it is a good result from an 8V. Its a 50BHP increase.

Cool, just wasn't sure what the 8v engines would produce with a map. Gotta be well happy with the result then. :thumbs:

 

[Will DCE]

I got 167.8 BHP and torque 257.4 ftlbs.

took a bit to find paperwork , running CRD2
max power at engine was 158.6
max torque was 288.2
so the box was down on bhp - 9.2
but up on torque + 30.8
:dontknow:

 

[adamnbrown]

What year is your car?

 

[Missing_pilot]

generally the rule with mapping is.. more power = less torque, more torque = less power? :shrug:

 

[Will DCE]

What year is your car?

Its 57 plate mate

 

[adamnbrown]

O same as mine. Where abouts are you from then will have to set a meet up sometime.

 

[Will DCE]

O same as mine. Where abouts are you from then will have to set a meet up sometime.

nr RAF Digby

 

[wheateruk]

how many miles are on the engine, ive heard that makes a difference?

 

[adamnbrown]

Mine is only just under 20,000